Agenda item
Continuation of review of refusal in respect of Alterations and extensions to dwellinghouse at Dove Cottage, The Gatehouse Lodge, Press Castle, Coldingham - 22/00046/RREF
Minutes:
CONTINUATION OF REVIEW 22/00039/RREF
11.1 With reference to paragraph 6 of the Minute of 20 February 2023, the Local Review Body continued their consideration of a request from Mr W Hannah, c/o Ferguson Planning, 54 Island Street, Galashiels to review the decision to refuse the planning application for the alterations and extension to dwellinghouse at Dove Cottage, The Gatehouse Lodge, Press Castle, Coldingham. The supporting papers included the written submissions from the Planning Officer and Applicant in respect of NPF4; written submissions from the Planning Officer and Applicant in respect of new information; Notice of Review (including the Decision Notice and Officer’s Report); Papers referred to in the Officer’s report; Additional Information and Consultation Replies, support comments and list of policies.
11.2 Members noted that there was an associated refusal of listed building consent for extensions and alterations to the property and that this was a matter for the DPEA should an appeal against that refusal be submitted. The proposal at Review was in relation to refusal of planning permission for the same works and Members noted that the proposal required to be assessed against the relevant Development Plan Policies relating to the refusal of planning permission. There had been submitted two versions of the proposals during the processing of the planning application, Drawing no. 22/B943/PL03 which had been superseded by 22/B943/PL03 Revision A, the latter being the drawing that was refused planning permission by the Appointed Officer. The applicant had submitted the Review only on the basis of the original drawing i.e. Drawing no. 22/B943/PL03. The Review Body noted both drawings and differences between them and that they were entitled to consider both in their determination of the Review. Members noted the requirements of the LDP Policy PMD2 in terms of scale, massing and height of any house extensions and alterations and to recognise context and finish in materials which complemented the existing building and area. It was noted that Dove Cottage was a Category C statutorily listed building and that LDP Policy EP7 and NPF4 Policy 7 seek to protect the character and integrity of the listed building, together with high quality materials and design.
Members considered both versions of the drawing and all submissions on the proposals and did not consider that the overall design of the extensions integrated successfully with the listed building, Members expressed particular concern in that the flat roofs and means by which the extensions were attached to the house would jar with the appearance of the house and impact on its character and integrity. The proposals may have complied more with Policy if the approach had been a traditional design with pitched roofing or possible detachment from the dwellinghouse.
DECISION
AGREED that:-
(a) the request for review had been competently made in terms of Section 43A of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997;
(b) the review could be considered without the need for further procedure;
(c) the proposed development was contrary to Local Development Plan 2016 policy EP7 (Listed Buildings) and Policy 7 of NPF4 as it would not respect the original structure due to its excessive scale and poorly related design. The proposed development would not maintain the special architectural or historic quality of the building and would have a significant adverse impact on its special character and appearance.
(d) the Officer’s decision to refuse the application be upheld and varied and the application be refused, for the reasons detailed in Appendix V to this Minute.
Supporting documents:
- Decision Notice - Dove Cottage - (Dated), item 15. PDF 141 KB
- Item 13(a) - HERIT OFF - IMPACT_OF_PF4, item 15. PDF 536 KB
- Item 13(a) PLAN OFF -NPF4, item 15. PDF 192 KB
- Item 13(a) - Appl Resp - NPF4, item 15. PDF 46 KB
- Item 13(b) 2201125FUL-APPLICATION FORM, item 15. PDF 219 KB
- Item 13(b) 2201125FUL-REPORT_OF_HAND, item 15. PDF 125 KB
- NOR 1 - NOTICE_OF_REVIEW_FORM-3709911, item 15. PDF 83 KB
- NOR 2 - REVIEW_SUMMARY_OF_DOCUMENTS, item 15. PDF 39 KB
- NOR 3 - APPEAL_STATEMENT, item 15. PDF 2 MB
- NOR 4 - CD1_PART_1_-_OFFICER_REPORT, item 15. PDF 125 KB
- NOR 5 - CD1_PART_2_-_DECISION_NOTICE, item 15. PDF 71 KB
- NOR 6 - CD2_-_LOCATION_PLAN, item 15. PDF 481 KB
- NOR 7 - CD3_PART_1-PROPOSED EXIST PLAN, item 15. PDF 724 KB
- NOR 8 - CD3_PART_2-PROPOSED EXIST PLAN, item 15. PDF 681 KB
- NOR 9 - CD3_PART3-PROPOSED EXIST PLAN, item 15. PDF 1 MB
- NOR 10 -22_00046_RREF-CD4_-_DE, item 15. PDF 1 MB
- Item 13(c) -2201125FUL-REFUSED_DRAW, item 15. PDF 2 MB
- Item13(d) - 2201124LBC-DECISION_NOTICE, item 15. PDF 69 KB
- Item 13(d) - 2201124LBC-REPORT_OF_HAND, item 15. PDF 125 KB
- Item 13(d) -2201735LBC-DECISION_NOTICE, item 15. PDF 179 KB
- Item 13(d) - 2201735LBC-REPORT_OF_HAND, item 15. PDF 101 KB
- Item 13(d) -2200263LBC-DECISION_NOTICE, item 15. PDF 172 KB
- Item 13(d) 2200263LBC-REPORT_OF_HAND, item 15. PDF 99 KB
- Item 13(d) 01701364FUL-DECISION_NOTICE, item 15. PDF 184 KB
- Item 13(d) 1701364FUL-REPORT_OF_HAND, item 15. PDF 57 KB
- Item 13(d) 0401640FUL-DECISION_NOTICE, item 15. PDF 5 MB
- Item 13(d) 0401640FUL REP HAND, item 15. PDF 460 KB
- Item13(d) 0401639LBC-DECISION_NOTICE, item 15. PDF 5 MB
- Item 13(d) 0402095COU-DECISION_NOTICE, item 15. PDF 545 KB
- Item 13(d) 0301009LBC-DECISION_NOTICE, item 15. PDF 632 KB
- Item 13(d) 0301010FUL-DECISION_NOTICE, item 15. PDF 638 KB
- Item 13(e) - 2201125FUL-CONSULREPLIES, item 15. PDF 492 KB
- Item 13(f) -2201125FULSUPPORT - COM, item 15. PDF 2 KB