Agenda item
Continuation of review of refusal in respect of the Erection of dwellinghouse on Land South West of Castleside Cottage, Selkirk - 22/00041/RREF
Copies of the following papers attached:-
Minutes:
CONTINUATION OF REVIEW - 22/00041/RREF
With reference to paragraph 4 of the Minute of 23 January 2023, the Local Review Body continued their consideration of the request from Mr P J Lewis, c/o RM Architecture Ltd, Bloomfield, Heatherlie Park, Selkirk to review the decision to refuse the planning application for the erection of a dwellinghouse on Land South West of Castleside Cottage, Selkirk. The supporting papers included the written submission from the Applicant detailing the fibre cement cladding and colour proposed, together with photographs of the use of the material; Notice of Review (including the Decision Notice and Officer’s Report); Papers referred to in the Officer’s report; consultation replies further representations and list of policies. It had previously been accepted that there was a building group present and the site was an appropriate addition to that group under the Housing in the Countryside Policy HD2 and the relevant SPG. The Applicant had also supplied a sample of the fibre cement to be used.
2.1 It was reported that the Scottish Government had adopted, with effect from 13 February 2023, the new National Planning Framework (NPF4) which superseded previous guidance and had been incorporated into the Local Development Plan. Members noted that in accordance with the terms of Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, the Planning Authority must ensure that Planning Decisions and Reviews took account of the new Framework. To this end, members agreed that the review be continued to allow the Applicant and Planning Officer the opportunity to submit comments on the impact of NPF4 on the Application.
DECISION
AGREED that:-
(a) the request for review had been competently made in terms of Section 43A of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997;
(b) the review could not be considered without the need for further procedure in the form of written submissions;
(c) the Applicant and Planning Officer be given the opportunity to submit an NPF4 statement; and
(d) consideration of the review be continued to a future meeting on a date to be confirmed.
Supporting documents:
- Item 5(a) -SUPPLEM_INFO - CASE_STUDY, item 3. PDF 553 KB
- Item 5(b) - 2101618FUL - OFFICER E-MAIL, item 3. PDF 35 KB
- Item 5(b) - Daylight Assessment, item 3. PDF 2 MB
- Item 5(b) - 21001SD001 Rev K-Agent e-mail, item 3. PDF 3 MB
- Item 5(b) - 21001SD002 Rev D-Agent e-mail, item 3. PDF 178 KB
- Item 5(b) - 210618FUL-APPLICATION_FORM, item 3. PDF 466 KB
- Item 5(b) - 2101618FUL -AGENT E-MAIL, item 3. PDF 35 KB
- Item 5(b) - 2101618FUL_-_DECISION_NOTICE, item 3. PDF 71 KB
- Item 5(b) - 2101618FUL_-_REFUSED_DRAWINGS, item 3. PDF 2 MB
- Item 5(b) - 2101618FUL-APPEN1 PRE-APP.RES, item 3. PDF 84 KB
- Item 5(b) - 2101618FUL-OFF. E-MAIL, item 3. PDF 92 KB
- Item 5(b) - 2101618FUL-PLANN STATET_OCT21, item 3. PDF 3 MB
- Item 5(b) - 2101618FUL-REPORT OF HANDL, item 3. PDF 114 KB
- Item 5(b) - 2200041RREF-OFF. E-MAIL, item 3. PDF 710 KB
- Item 5(b) -2101618FUL-APPL.FORM, item 3. PDF 466 KB
- Item 5(b) -2101618FUL-DEC.NOTICE, item 3. PDF 71 KB
- Item 5(b) Developer contr- Off. email, item 3. PDF 586 KB
- Item 5(b) Flood Risk Consult - Off. email, item 3. PDF 108 KB
- Item 5(b) - 2101618FUL-CONSUL REPLIES, item 3. PDF 2 MB
- Item 5(b) - COMM. COUNCIL-FURTHER REPR., item 3. PDF 105 KB