Agenda item
Consider request for review of refusal of application for change of use of land and plot layout to form extension to caravan park on Land West Of Pease Bay Holiday Home Park Cockburnspath - 22/00043/RREF
Copies of the following papers attached:-
Minutes:
review of 22/00043/RREF
There had been circulated copies of a request from Mr Graham Hodgson, c/o Tetra Tech, Quay West, Traford Wharf Road, to review the decision to refuse the planning application for the change of use of land and plot layout to form extension to caravan park on Land West of Pease Bay Holiday Home Park, Cockburnspath. The supporting papers included the Notice of Review (including the Decision Notice and Officer’s Report); Papers referred to in the Officer’s report; additional information; consultation replies; objection comments, Applicants response to objections and list of policies. Members noted that the present caravan site consisted of 330 caravans and the application was for a further 19 lodges for a mixture of owned and short term lets. Members considered the impact of the development in terms of the landscape and visual impacts and whilst divided over the level of impact that the extension would have on the Special Landscape Area and coastline, concluded the site could successfully accommodate the development, especially once ground shaping and landscape mitigation were undertaken. Members went onto consider the potential impact on the local infrastructure and flooding and noted the satisfactory findings of the Flood Risk Assessment and lack of objections from Transport Scotland and the Roads Officer. Members were therefore content that the road system could accommodate additional traffic generated from the site and that flood risk was not an issue.
VOTE
Councillor Thompson, seconded by Councillor Orr moved that the officers’ decision be upheld and the application be refused.
Councillor Moffat, seconded by Councillor Scott moved as an amendment that the officer’s decision be overturned and the application be approved.
On a show of hands Members voted as follows:-
Motion - 4 votes
Amendment - 5 votes
The amendment was accordingly carried.
DECISION
DECIDED that:-
(a) the request for review had been competently made in terms of Section 43A of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997;
(b) the review could be considered without the need for further procedure;
(c) After considering all relevant information, the Local Review Body concluded that the development was consistent with Policies PMD2, ED8, EP5, EP14 and relevant Supplementary Planning Guidance. The proposal was considered to be an appropriately scaled and designed extension to the existing holiday park, with limited and acceptable impacts on the locally designated landscape, visual amenity of the area and local infrastructure, providing additional local economic benefits and subject to appropriate conditions
(d) the officer’s decision to refuse the application be overturned, for the reasons detailed in Appendix II to this Minute and subject to conditions.
Supporting documents:
- LRB decision notice - Pease Bay (Dated), item 7. PDF 152 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 1 - NOTICE_OF_REVIEW_FORM-3703685, item 7. PDF 272 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 2 - REVIEW_-_STATEMENT_OF_CASE-3703687, item 7. PDF 2 MB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 3 - 21_01081_FUL_-_OFFICERS_REPORT-3703690, item 7. PDF 156 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 5 - EDEN_ENVIRONMENTS_LTD_COMMMENTS_ON_LANDSCAPE_OFFICER_RESPONSE, item 7. PDF 4 MB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 6 - SITE_LOCATION_PLAN_COLOURED-3703693, item 7. PDF 379 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 7 - SECTION_THROUGH_ROADS-3703694, item 7. PDF 121 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 8 - ADDITIONAL_SECTIONS_REFERENCE-3704099, item 7. PDF 97 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 9 - ADDITIONAL_SECTIONS_1-3704100, item 7. PDF 425 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 10 - ADDITIONAL_SECTIONS_2-3704101, item 7. PDF 352 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 11 - ADDITIONAL_SECTIONS_3-3704102, item 7. PDF 279 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 12 - GRAVITAS_FLEXMSE_BROCHURE-3704109, item 7. PDF 901 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 13 - 21_01081_FUL_-_DECISION_NOTICE, item 7. PDF 71 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 14 - APPLICATION_FORMS-3704105, item 7. PDF 96 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 15 - DRONE_BEFORE_AFTER-3704106, item 7. PDF 272 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 16 - MEMORIAL_PARK-3704110, item 7. PDF 321 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 17 - PLANT_SCHEDULE-3704116, item 7. PDF 330 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 18 - LANDSCAPE_PLAN-3704112, item 7. PDF 2 MB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 19 - PLANTING_PLAN-3704115, item 7. PDF 2 MB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 20 - LANDSCAPE___VISUAL_APPRAISAL-3704121, item 7. PDF 2 MB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 21 - RETAINING_WALL_COMPARED-3704103, item 7. PDF 477 KB
- Item 8(a) - NOR 22 - PLANNING_STATEMENT-3704122, item 7. PDF 296 KB
- Item 8(b) - 21_01081_FUL_-_REFUSED_DRAWINGS-3704192, item 7. PDF 3 MB
- Item 8(c) - 19_01709_FUL_-_DECISION_NOTICE-3713029, item 7. PDF 25 KB
- Item 8(c) - 19_01709_FUL_-_REPORT_OF_HANDLING-3713030, item 7. PDF 123 KB
- Item 8(c) - 19_01709_FUL_-_TOPOGRAPHICAL_SURVEY-3704599, item 7. PDF 819 KB
- Item 8(c) - 21_01081_FUL_-_CONSULTATION_REPLIES-3704175, item 7. PDF 4 MB
- Item 8(c) - 21_01081_FUL_-_FLOOD_RISK___DRAINAGE_ASSESSMENT-3720364, item 7. PDF 2 MB
- Item 8(c) - 26.05.2022_AGENT_TO_PLANNING_OFFICER_LETTER, item 7. PDF 1 MB
- Item 8(d) - 21_01081_FUL_-_CONSULTATION_REPLIES-3704175, item 7. PDF 4 MB
- Item 8(e) - 21_01081_FUL_-_OBJECTIONS-3704271, item 7. PDF 67 MB
- Item 8(f) - APPLICANTS_RESPONSE_TO_OBJECTIONS_16.09.2021-3704123, item 7. PDF 138 KB
- Item 8(g) - Policy List, item 7. PDF 109 KB