Agenda item
Management and Maintenance of Public Halls
Consider report by Director Strategic Commissioning and Partnerships. (Attached)
Minutes:
1.1
During discussion of this item, Councillor
Thornton-Nicol noted she was Chair of the Newtown Community Wing
and Councillor Anderson noted she was the Council Representative on
Peebles Drill Hall management committee. Neither Councillor declared an interest in the
item and remained in the meeting.
1.2
There had been circulated copies of a report by
Director Strategic Commissioning and Partnerships that outlined an
evaluation of the community contribution to the management and
maintenance of public halls, including those managed by Live
Borders. Scottish Borders Council had
responsibility for 62 halls, and the Federation of Village Halls
indicated they had 96 members in the Borders. Scottish Borders Council retained maintenance and
repair responsibility for the 62 halls that it was responsible for,
including those leased to Live Borders, and individual leases
contained information on the level of maintenance and repair
obligation, including where Communities/Voluntary Management
Committees had no obligation or responsibility. Scottish Borders Council provided annual funding
to the Federation of Village Halls of approximately £50,000
per year and Live Borders provided voluntary management committees
with funding on an annual basis towards operational
costs. The social value of
halls/community centres included use of the venues for regular
local events and activities, emergency response and Covid-response.
Volunteers also regular fund raising for improvements to their
building, and as a proxy measure, this could inform the
‘community contribution’.
Programme Manager, Mr McMurdo, advised that anecdotally a number of
community centres had voluntary management committees, although
some faced challenges maintaining their management committee and
recruiting young members.
1.3 Under the Service Provision Agreement Scottish Borders Council had with Live Borders for the delivery of sport and cultural services, 29 halls were under the contractual responsibility of Live Borders. The maintenance and repair responsibility for these halls remained with Scottish Borders Council under the terms of a Property and Estates Service Level Agreement. Members discussed the funding of halls and the support provided to management committee from Live Borders, noting the example of the Victoria Hall in Selkirk which was owned by the Common Good Fund and operated by Live Borders. The Selkirk Common Good Fund was responsible for paying for maintenance while Live Borders retained income from the Hall. While Live Borders provided funding to community centres, part of the process involved a recharge to the management committees, which meant these committees needed to fund raise to pay for items. This process perhaps needed reviewed. It was noted that the funding provided by Scottish Borders Council to the Federation of Village Halls areas implied that the value assigned to each area did not have a consistent funding per village hall formula. It was advised this may have been due to some federations charging administration fees which may affect the respective funding value. Members agreed that a paper should be brought back to the committee by officers outlining further detail of the management and funding of village halls, including the consistency in terms of support, which hall committees were active/dormant, which halls were struggling, and the shape of how hall committees functioned. This would highlight where there were differences in usage, funding, characteristics and management regimes to allow the Committee to judge the fairness of the operation and funding of village halls across the region.
DECISION
(a)
AGREED that the Director Strategic
Commissioning and Partnerships would provide a further report to
the Committee including a statement of the operating
characteristics and funding regime in regard to management and
funding of halls across the Borders to develop an understanding of
fairness and functioning of management committees.
(b) NOTED the evaluation of the community contribution to the management and maintenance of public halls, including those managed by Live Borders as detailed within this report.
MEMBER
Councillor Fullarton left the meeting during consideration of the above item of business.
Supporting documents: