Agenda item
Internal Audit Work to February 2022
Consider report by Chief Officer Audit and Risk. (Attached)
Minutes:
1.1
There had been circulated copies of a report by the
Chief Officer Audit and Risk that provided members of the Audit and
Scrutiny Committee with details of the recent work carried out by
Internal Audit and the recommended audit actions agreed by
Management to improve internal controls and governance
arrangements. The work Internal Audit
carried out in the period from 1 – 28 February 2022,
associated with the delivery of the approved Internal Audit Annual
Plan 2021-22, was detailed in the report. A total of two final Internal Audit reports had
been issued. There were four
recommendations made associated with the two reports (one
‘High’-rated, one ‘Medium’-rated and two
‘Low’-rated). An Executive
Summary of the final Internal Audit assurance reports issued,
including audit objective, findings, good practice, recommendations
(where appropriate) and the Chief Officer Audit and Risk’s
independent and objective opinion on the adequacy of the control
environment and governance arrangements within each audit area, was
shown in Appendix 1 of the report. The
SBC Internal Audit function conformed to the professional standards
as set out in Public Sector Internal Audit Standards (PSIAS) (2017)
including the production of the report to communicate the results
of the reviews. Internal Audit
assurance work that was underway was detailed in paragraph 4.6 of
the report. The Chief Officer Audit and
Risk highlighted Internal Audit consultancy and other work which
included the Fit for 2024 transformation programme, and a specific
training workshop for all Internal Audit team members on the
Council’s new Contract Management System, as part of the
internal rollout of this system across the Council’s services
to those involved in contract management. The Chief Officer Audit and Risk advised of the
‘High’-rated recommendation that had been made in the
Internal Audit review of Schools Financial and Business
Administration Processes to address completion of e-learning
training that should be expected in schools. There were further recommendations for schools
inventory to ensure up-to-date inventories, especially for fire or
other such incidents.
1.2
In response to a question about the completion rates
for mandatory Child Protection training, particularly in teaching
staff, the Chief Officer Audit and Risk confirmed that encouraging
conversations had taken place with the Director Education and
Lifelong Learning and the Chief Officer Education with regard to
completion of mandatory e-learning and that reports were produced
on completion of training. Commitments
had been made for how training would be facilitated for teachers
when not in class and where there were opportunities to take up
training. A dashboard for when staff
completed training needed more management oversight and there were
very encouraging signs of that being quickly addressed. The Chief Executive advised that the current
numbers of non-completion were not to hand but had been
requested. When this matter first came
to light, Ms Meadows had spoken to the Director of Education and
Lifelong Learning and all staff had now been given a clear
instruction to complete the training.
This was also being looked at across the whole organisation to
ensure compliance. It would also be
picked up by the Review Group which had recently been established
to steer the action plan derived from the recommendations in the
Independent Inquiry into the Council’s handling of concerns
raised about a former SBC employee who had subsequently been
charged with assaulting children and abusive behaviour at a
school. Ms Stacey confirmed that part
of the conversation with the Director had been around investigating
any barriers for non-completion, such as capacity, opportunity,
etc. and consideration would be given to building something into
in-service days to address this. The
Director Finance and Corporate Governance advised that some
mandatory training on SBLearn was time
limited and had to be renewed so some staff training may have
lapsed. It had not proved possible to
have a calendar in SBLearn which would
highlight to staff when their training certification had
lapsed. There was also a regular
turnover of staff within schools and depending on when the snapshot
of completion rates was taken the position could vary, this could
relate to new staff who had yet to undertake the
training. Mr Robertson confirmed that
all staff were required to undertake SBLearn training and previous training in another
organisation was not recognised. The
Principal Internal Auditor advised there was a facility to upload
professional qualifications however this was not part of
SBLearn.
Members requested that the Review Group should follow up on
mandatory e-learning as part of its first quarter work.
1.3 During the meeting, the Chief Executive received numbers associated with non-completion of the e-learning training within Education. Out of 2,721 people that should have completed e-learning training, 2,203 had done so. This corresponded to a 19% non-completion rate. There were some areas within the Education Service where all were complete but others up to 78% had not. Both Ms Meadows and Ms Stacey confirmed this would be followed up by both the Review Group and Internal Audit. Any issues would be raised at Council by the Review Group and would be brought back to Audit & Scrutiny Committee as part of any Internal Audit procedures.
DECISION
NOTED:
(a)
The final assurance reports issued in
the period from 1 to 28 February 2022 associated with the delivery
of the approved Internal Audit Annual Plan 2021-22;
(b)
The Internal Audit Assurance Work in
Progress and Internal Audit Consultancy and Other Work carried out
in accordance with the approved Internal Audit Charter;
(c)
The assurance provided on internal
controls and governance arrangements in place for the areas covered
by this Internal Audit work; and
(d) The Review Group would follow-up on mandatory e-learning as part of its first quarter work.
Supporting documents: