Agenda and minutes
Venue: via Microsoft Teams
Contact: William Mohieddeen Tel: 01835 826504, Email: william.mohieddeen@scotborders.gov.uk
Link: Live stream link
No. | Item |
---|---|
Order of Business. Minutes: The Chair notified the Committee he was minded to change the order of business. Due to the nature of the content and likely discussion of item 7 on the agenda, Progress Update on LDS Financial Management Update, this could lead to the identification of recipients of particular services provided by the Learning Disability Service.
DECISION AGREED to take item 7 on the agenda as private business, within the terms of paragraphs 3 and 10 of Part 1 of Schedule 7 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973. |
|
Minute of Meeting of the Audit and Scrutiny Committee held on 19 August 2021 to be approved and signed by the Chairman. (Copy attached.) Minutes: There had been circulated copies of the Minute of the meeting of the Audit and Scrutiny held on 19 August 2021. With reference to the decisions at paragraph 2.4, Responsible Dog Ownership, the Clerk to the Council advised that an update on when the Committee would receive the information requested would be brought to the next meeting of the Committee. With reference to paragraph 3, a potential Scottish Borders Autism Survey review, the Clerk advised that the Strategy had been agreed during the shadow year of the H&SC Integrated Joint Board, and further information was being sought on the likely review process. This would be provided to the next meeting of the Committee.
DECISION AGREED the Minute for signature by the Chairman. |
|
To note the progress made on the Action Tracker. (Copy attached.) Minutes: There had been circulated
copies of the Action Tracker. The Chief
Officer Audit and Risk presented the Action Tracker and confirmed
that it did not at this point include actions relating to Scrutiny
business. The Executive Director
Finance & Regulatory provided a verbal ICT Cybersecurity update
in relation to action 3 from the meeting held on 10 May
2021. Officers had been working with
CGI in the last few months on updating the PSN accreditation with
the Cabinet Office. Penetration testing
had been carried out and there were a number of remediation points
to address before a submission was anticipated at the end of
September. A piece of work had been
requested from CGI on wider Cybersecurity, with further details
requested on the specific work and pricing elements for
this. A further quote for this work was
anticipated shortly. (a)
NOTED the Action Tracker. (b) AGREED to remove action 3 from the meeting of 10 May 2021 from the Action Tracker. |
|
Risk Management in Services Verbal Presentation by Director Infrastructure & Environment. (Copy attached.) Minutes: 1.1
A verbal presentation of Risk Management in the
Assets & Infrastructure Service was delivered by the Director
Infrastructure & Environment, Mr John Curry. The Director presented the structure of risks
managed across the teams noting the recent change of directorates
which included Assets and Infrastructure now being called
Infrastructure and Environment, and that included Planning and
Building Standards which would be included in the next
update. Corporate risks managed by the
Director included property, capital projects and climate
change. In response to questions from
Members, Mr Curry explained that some work was being outsourced at
the moment to local specialists. That
would continue but there needed to be consistency of support and
marketing to make the best of the Council’s
assets. While it was noted that house
prices were at a premium in some areas, a balance was needed in
terms of selling of Council property to get the best return, and
linking that to place making and getting the best for
communities. Discussion then centred on
the full use of older buildings and properties that were difficult
to convert, and issues with being factors on tenanted land (Common
Good farms). Mr Curry explained that
this related to the corporate landlord model with a piece of work
to do to recognise land ownership and management. Councillor Anderson suggested that the
ward-by-ward discussions take place with Councillors on property,
given the successful discussions around playparks which had been
held with Members, and Mr Curry advised he would pick up on this
suggestion. With regards to the
relationship with Live Borders, Mr Curry confirmed that both
organisations held large estates with specialisms e.g. schools and
swimming pools and all were visible, public buildings. These suffered to a certain extend with
maintenance and age-related issues.
There was only so much resource available and that needed to be
balanced against priorities. There were
possibly opportunities around the capital investment programme to
address some age-related issues with the estate and the Council
would work with Live Borders to deliver a more sustainable estate
in future. In response to a question
about community centres and their potential loss of business as
previous tenants had found alternative venues due to Covid
closures, this would be picked up with the Live Borders Management
Team as well as their Property Officer. 1.2 The Director continued the presentation covering capital projects. The capital programme was significant, setting out need and addressing the best ways to address these needs. It was noted that due to the pandemic there was a materials shortage in construction including inflated prices which was having an impact on the Scottish Borders Council programme. In terms of climate change, it was hoped to reduce the reliance on fossil fuels, but bio mass heating may not be the way forward in terms of heating buildings. Work was needed on the fabric of buildings to ensure they were as high performing as possible and not so reliant on additional heating. Buildings also needed to be the right size to get ... view the full minutes text for item 4. |
|
Annual Treasury Management Report 2020-21 PDF 192 KB Consider report by Director Finance & Corporate Governance. (Copy attached.) Additional documents: Minutes: There had been circulated copies of the Annual Treasury Management Report 2020-21 by the Executive Director, Finance & Regulatory Services. The CIPFA Code of Practice on Treasury Management in the Public Services required an annual report on treasury management to be submitted to Council following the end of each financial year and the report highlighted the Council’s treasury activity undertaken in the year ending 31 March 2021 and the performance of the Treasury function. Appendix 1 to the report contained the annual report of treasury management activities for 2020/21 and an analysis of performance against targets set in relation to Prudential and Treasury Management Indicators. The performance comparisons reported were based on the revised indicators agreed as part of the mid-year report approved on 23 November 2020. This showed the Council’s borrowing requirement to fund the capital investment undertaken during 2020/21, how much the Council actually borrowed against the sums budgeted, and the level of external debt within approved limits. During the year, the Council had again, where possible, deferred borrowing using surplus cash rather than undertake new borrowing. However, the Council did undertake temporary borrowing for cash flow purposes amounting to £15m during the year. Treasury management activity for the year had been undertaken in compliance with approved policy and the Code. The Council remained under-borrowed against its Capital Financing Requirement at 31 March 2021. In response to Members’ questions, the Director, Mr Robertson, advised that, with regard to the capital expenditure being down by 20% and the timing and execution of the capital programme, this relied heavily on the forecasting of project managers, and should they be over-optimistic then this in turn impacted on the treasury management forecast. The programme was also impacted by inflation and the shortage of construction materials which in turn could impact on the ability to spend capital funds by March 2022. The Pension & Investments Manager, Ms Kirsty Robb, confirmed that Link Asset Services, the Councils Treasury Advisors, would be in attendance at a future briefing to speak to Members about the capital programme and PFIs in relation to treasury management. Mr Robertson further advised that the capital financing requirement was the amount that still had to be put in place to ensure the capital programme was fully funded and the gross borrowing noted in the strategy was the amount already actually borrowed. It was a complicated position to manage the cash position of the Council with outflows and inflows being reviewed to a daily basis, to ensure enough liquidity was maintained. In terms of funding resources, Ms Robb confirmed that some temporary borrowing had been carried out with other local authorities, and SBC could also lend to other local authorities, although traditionally the Council had not carried out the latter. Each project within the capital programme had different nuances as to why it was not in line with forecast and any variances were reported in the quarterly capital monitoring reports to the Executive Committee. Mr Robertson added that the size and complexity of the ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |
|
Internal Audit Work to August 2021 PDF 258 KB Consider report by Chief Officer Audit & Risk. (Copy attached.) Minutes: 6.1 There had been
circulated copies of a report by the Chief Officer, Audit &
Risk, on Internal Audit Work to August 2021. The report provided Members with details of the
recent work carried out by Internal Audit and the recommended audit
actions agreed by Management to improve internal controls and
governance arrangements. The work
Internal Audit had carried out in the period from 12 June to 27
August 2021 associated with the delivery of the approved Internal
Audit Annual Plan 2021/22 was detailed.
A total of 2 final Internal Audit reports had been issued –
Scottish Government Support Grants and Performance Management Local
Government Benchmarking Framework - and there were 3
recommendations (medium rated) made associated with the Support
Grants report. An Executive Summary of
the final Internal Audit reports issued, including audit objective,
findings, good practice, recommendations (where appropriate) and
the Chief Officer Audit & Risk’s independent and
objective opinion on the adequacy of the control environment and
governance arrangements within each audit area, was shown in
Appendix 1 of the report. The SBC
Internal Audit function conformed to the professional standards as
set out in Public Sector Internal Audit Standards (PSIAS)(2017),
including the production of the report to communicate the results
of the reviews. 6.2 It was
highlighted that in financial year 2020-21 work had been done early
on coronavirus business support funds, including the audit of
Scottish Government support grants.
Legislation surrounding these grants was complex and introduced
different grants that had to be incorporated into processes and
procedures quickly to allow payments to be made in a timely
manner. It was noted that in terms of
forms, processes and due diligence checks regarding genuine
suppliers, fraudulent attempts had been reported through
appropriate bodies and shared with other Councils to try to ensure
no payment was made in the first place.
Cabinet Office and Audit Scotland developed National Fraud
Initiative and initial data checks requested of public sector
organisations but in the Chief Officer’s opinion, enough
checks were made on the genuineness of applications. The recommendations on Council tax rebates could
be applied to other aspects of Council business. DECISION NOTED:
(a) the final assurance reports issued in the period from 12 June to 27 August 2021 associated with the delivery of the approved Internal Audit Annual Plan 2021/22;
(b) the
Internal Audit Assurance Work in Progress and Internal Audit
Consultancy and Other Work carried out in accordance with the
approved Internal Audit Charter; and (c) the assurance provided on internal controls and governance arrangements in place for the areas covered by this Internal Audit work.
MEMBER Councillor Greenwell joined the meeting.
|
|
Audit Scotland Fraud and Irregularity Update 2020-21 PDF 218 KB Consider report by Chief Officer Audit & Risk. (Copy attached.) Additional documents: Minutes: There had been circulated copies of the recently published Audit Scotland Fraud and Irregularity Update 2020-21 along with a covering report by the Chief Officer, Audit & Risk, which aimed to make members aware of the Audit Scotland Update and the Management Actions required in response for improvement and assurance purposes. Having robust fraud prevention and investigation arrangements in place contributed to safeguarding the Council’s financial resources, for delivery of services, as part of protecting the public purse. A focus on prevention and detection and promotion of anti-fraud culture across the Council, taking account of reducing resources, was associated with the Council’s Counter Fraud Policy, which stated the roles and responsibilities in tackling fraud; with the primary responsibility for the prevention, detection and investigation of fraud resting with Management. During discussion, the role of the Integrity Group was covered highlighting that this was an officers’ forum which had representatives from across the Council’s Services to support Management to fulfil their responsibilities in tackling fraud. Its purpose was to improve the Council’s resilience to fraud, theft, corruption, and crime; overseeing the counter fraud policy framework; agreeing and monitoring the implementation of counter fraud improvement actions; raising awareness as a method of prevention; and performing self-assessment checks against best practice. Mrs Stacey confirmed that information could be sent out to staff on a regular basis and the link to the Audit Scotland update included. While there had been an increase in scams and phishing, regular staff updates had been issued to remind all staff, including those working from home, of the dangers. With regard to Cybersecurity, the CGI Cyber Security Officer attended a number of different groups and the IT Client Manager also had internal responsibility, with appropriate system based controls in place.
DECISION
(a) NOTED the Audit Scotland Fraud and Irregularity Update 2020/21, published in July 2021.
(b) AGREED:
(i) to request that the
Integrity Group considers the report as part of their counter fraud
role and responsibilities and determines any Management Actions
required in response for improvement and assurance
purposes;
(ii)
to request that the Integrity Group, at the same time, revisits the
assessment of counter fraud controls associated with the
covid-19-emerging-fraud-risks carried out during 2020/21, and
assesses progress on any agreed actions;
(iii) to
request that the Integrity Group reports back to the Committee on
findings and necessary actions; and, (iv) that the Chief Officer Audit & Risk arranged to disseminate the Audit Scotland Update to Council staff as necessary.
|
|
Any Other Audit Items which the Chairman Decides are Urgent. Minutes: The Chair advised that an additional meeting of the Audit & Scrutiny Committee was due to be held on 5 October to consider a petition which had been received. The meeting due to be held on 21 October would consider both audit and scrutiny business, with the audit business being heard first. DECISION NOTED.
|
|
Private Business Minutes: DECISION AGREED under Section 50A(4) of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 to exclude the public from the meeting during consideration of the business detailed in the Appendix to this Minute on the grounds that it involved the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraphs 3 and 10 of Part I of Schedule 7A to the Act.
SUMMARY OF PRIVATE BUSINESS
10. PROGRESS UPDATE ON LDS FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATION The Committee considered a verbal update from the Joint Manager of the Learning Disability Service on progress with the LDS Financial Management Recommendation.
|
|
Progress Update on LDS Financial Management recommendation Verbal presentation by LDS Manager |